- X/Open Curses states that the ACS_ definitions are char constants. For
+ X/Open Curses states that the ACS_ definitions are char constants. For
the wide-character implementation (see curs_add_wch), there are
- analogous WACS_ definitions which are cchar_t constants. Some
+ analogous WACS_ definitions which are cchar_t constants. Some
implementations are problematic:
o Some implementations define the ACS symbols to a constant (such as
@@ -210,8 +210,8 @@
NetBSD also uses an array, actually named _acs_char, with a #define
for compatibility.
- o HPUX curses equates some of the ACS_ symbols to the analogous WACS_
- symbols as if the ACS_ symbols were wide characters. The
+ o HPUX curses equates some of the ACS_ symbols to the analogous WACS_
+ symbols as if the ACS_ symbols were wide characters. The
misdefined symbols are the arrows and other symbols which are not
used for line-drawing.
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
implementations use i (lowercase).
None of the terminal descriptions on Unix platforms use uppercase-
- I, except for Solaris (i.e., screen's terminal description,
+ I, except for Solaris (i.e., screen's terminal description,
apparently based on the X/Open documentation around 1995). On the
other hand, the terminal description gs6300 (AT&T PC6300 with EMOTS
Terminal Emulator) uses lowercase-i.
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@
second-hand list of their character descriptions has come to light.
The ACS-prefixed names for them were invented for ncurses(3x).
- The displayed values for the ACS_ and WACS_ constants depend on
+ The displayed values for the ACS_ and WACS_ constants depend on
o the library configuration, i.e., ncurses versus ncursesw, where the
latter is capable of displaying Unicode while the former is not,