.\" authorization. *
.\"***************************************************************************
.\"
-.\" $Id: curs_scanw.3x,v 1.11 2000/07/15 21:48:17 tom Exp $
+.\" $Id: curs_scanw.3x,v 1.12 2002/07/20 15:48:09 tom Exp $
.TH curs_scanw 3X ""
.SH NAME
\fBscanw\fR,
.SH SYNOPSIS
\fB#include <curses.h>\fR
-\fBint scanw(char *fmt\fR [\fB, arg\fR] \fB...);\fR
+\fBint scanw(char *fmt, ...);\fR
.br
-\fBint wscanw(WINDOW *win, char *fmt\fR [\fB, arg\fR] \fB...);\fR
+\fBint wscanw(WINDOW *win, char *fmt, ...);\fR
.br
-\fBint mvscanw(int y, int x, char *fmt\fR [\fB, arg\fR] \fB...);\fR
+\fBint mvscanw(int y, int x, char *fmt, ...);\fR
.br
-\fBint mvwscanw(WINDOW *win, int y, int x,\fR
- \fBchar *fmt\fR [\fB, arg]\fR \fB...);\fR
+\fBint mvwscanw(WINDOW *win, int y, int x, char *fmt, ...);\fR
.br
\fBint vw_scanw(WINDOW *win, char *fmt, va_list varglist);\fR
.br
for \fBsscanf\fR(3). Fields which do not map to a variable in the \fIfmt\fR
field are lost.
-The \fBvwscanw\fR routine is similar to \fBvwprintw\fR in that it performs a
-\fBwscanw\fR using a variable argument list. The third argument is a
-\fIva\fR_\fIlist\fR, a pointer to a list of arguments, as defined in
-\fB<varargs.h>\fR.
+The \fBvwscanw\fR and \fBvw_scanw\fR routines are analogous to \fBvscanf\fR.
+They perform a \fBwscanw\fR using a variable argument list.
+The third argument is a \fIva_list\fR,
+a pointer to a list of arguments, as defined in \fB<stdarg.h>\fR.
.SH RETURN VALUE
\fBvwscanw\fR returns \fBERR\fR on failure and an integer equal to the
number of fields scanned on success.
The XSI Curses standard, Issue 4 describes these functions. The function
\fBvwscanw\fR is marked TO BE WITHDRAWN, and is to be replaced by a function
\fBvw_scanw\fR using the \fB<stdarg.h>\fR interface.
+The Single Unix Specification, Version 2 states that
+\fBvw_scanw\fR is preferred to \fBvwscanw\fR since the latter requires
+including \fB<varargs.h>\fR, which
+cannot be used in the same file as \fB<stdarg.h>\fR.
+This implementation uses \fB<stdarg.h>\fR for both, because that header
+is included in \fB<curses.h\fR>.
+.LP
+Both XSI and The Single Unix Specification, Version 2 state that these
+functions return ERR or OK.
+Since the underlying \fBscanf\fR can return the number of items scanned,
+and the SVr4 code was documented to use this feature,
+this is probably an editing error which was introduced in XSI,
+rather than being done intentionally.
+Portable applications should only test if the return value is ERR,
+since the OK value (zero) is likely to be misleading.
+One possible way to get useful results would be to use a "%n" conversion
+at the end of the format string to ensure that something was processed.
.SH SEE ALSO
\fBcurses\fR(3X), \fBcurs_getstr\fR(3X), \fBcurs_printw\fR(3X), \fBscanf\fR(3S)
.\"#